2022 Statistics Snapshot

Download PDF graphic-based, print-friendly version

Jurisdiction Bar Examination Data

(First-time and repeat test taker status based on an examinee’s testing experience in the reporting jurisdiction only.)

July 2022 Totals

July persons taking: 45,871

• 19% of July 2022 examinees were repeaters
• 81% of July 2022 examinees were first-time takers
• July persons passing: 64%

July first-timers taking: 37,195

• Percentage of July first-timers passing: 74%

July repeaters taking: 8,676

• Percentage of July repeaters passing: 23%

12% of 2022 examinees were graduates of law schools outside the USA

• Total graduates of law schools outside the USA taking: 7,252
• Percentage of graduates from law schools outside the USA passing: 36%

NCBE MBE-Based Data

The first-time and repeat test taker data above are those obtained from the jurisdictions and are based on the examinees’ testing experience in the reporting jurisdiction only. Therefore, they do not account for possible previous attempts at the bar examination in other jurisdictions. The data below are based on an examinee having previously taken the MBE in any jurisdiction.*NOTE: In July 2020, many jurisdictions administered a remote exam instead of or in addition to the July 2020 or alternative-date exams offered due to the COVID-19 pandemic. (See “COVID-19: Implications for 2020 Statistics” in the Spring 2021 issue of the Bar Examiner.) These remote exams either included only a limited set of MBE questions (in the case of NCBE’s October 2020 remote testing option) or did not include the MBE at all (in the case of jurisdiction-drafted remote exams). (One jurisdiction also offered an in-person exam consisting solely of jurisdiction-drafted questions.) These types of exams administered during the July 2020 exam cycle account for 32,523 examinees. These remote testing options were scored by the individual jurisdictions that administered them, so NCBE does not maintain MBE records for the examinees who sat for those examinations. Because the likely first-timer and repeater counts/percentages below are based on whether an examinee has previously taken the MBE, attempts made by examinees who sat for these remote administrations during the July 2020 exam cycle (and therefore did not take the full, in-person MBE) are not reflected in the determination of status. As a result, it is likely that first-timer values continue to be somewhat inflated and those of repeaters depressed.

July 2022 Totals

July persons taking: 44,705

July likely repeaters taking: 10,200

• 23% of July 2022 examinees were likely repeaters

July likely first-timers taking: 34,505

• 77% of July 2021 examinees were likely first-time takers

* Prior to 2022, the first-time and repeat MBE-based test taker information calculated by NCBE was an approximation based on the NCBE Number and biographic data, which had not been used consistently in all jurisdictions across time. For example, in 2021, approximately 10% of examinees could not be tracked with certainty by NCBE as either first-time or repeat takers due to a lack of sufficient biographic information.The differences in the numbers of persons taking the MBE in the NCBE MBE-based data displayed above and those taking the bar examination as reported by jurisdictions in the jurisdiction bar examination data displayed on the previous page are accounted for by the following: (1) two jurisdictions do not administer the MBE (and are therefore not represented on this page but would be represented on the previous page), (2) jurisdictions track repeaters within their own jurisdiction whereas NCBE tracks repeaters across jurisdictions, and/or (3) certain jurisdictions accept banked or transferred (including concurrently transferred) scores.(Note: The counts and percentages in the NCBE MBE-based data above are based on the designations effective at the time of publication. Because these designations may change as more information becomes available over time to more completely identify examinees, the counts and percentages published above may differ slightly from previously published counts and percentages.)